Actions cover.jpg

Cover of "Actions"

What Can We Do With(out) Action?

By Christopher Roach

More than five years after the global financial collapse, architecture is still waking up with a hangover. As we continue to grasp for effective ways to bring our disciplinary knowledge to bear on the challenges of global urbanization, social justice, and climate change, architects remain caught in the limited field of possibilities delineated by earlier academic and professional discourses. Even if we have passed through the “semantic nightmare”[i] of postmodernism, played out the self-referential indulgences of autonomous architecture, and awakened from the decade-long fever dream of “postcritical” production, we still seem to find ourselves without a normative framework for what can be done with architecture, and in particular, what architecture can do for the city.[ii] 

A whole host of architects and urban theorists have offered a response to this paradoxical state by positing various forms of direct action as alternatives to these perceived ideological dead ends of theory and practice.  The energy and interest devoted to these explorations is both admirable and formidable, and rather than address the entire terrain of thinking and writing that has developed, I have selected a particular work that I argue is somehow symptomatic of the various texts and positions that have been fielded within the discourse to date.  I will take the liberty of using criticism of this text as an opportunity to elucidate these positions and unpack the possibilities and pitfalls that they represent.

Mirko Zardini and Giovanna Borasi’s Actions: What You Can Do with the City[iii] is a prime subject, offering us not only a milestone event and publication within discourse, but also a transect of the various writers and actors plying this field.

In this article, I argue that we must more closely interrogate Actions and peel back the layers of hype to ask how these activities can actually lead to new forms of material practice in architecture. This is a question that the mini-movement coalescing around guerilla urbanism has so far failed to adequately address; these exciting and vivid examples of crowd-sourced urbanism are too often taken at face value as being inherently good and not critically assessed for their potential to address the enormity and seriousness of urban challenges. Like the proponents of Everyday Urbanism, its prophets focus on finding alternative meanings and interpretations of the city and avoid any deep responsibility for how the shaping of physical space can engage the forces of urbanization at an adequate scale.[iv] How can this everyday urbanism, operating in the “fine grain” of the public realm, ever add up to more than the sum of its parts and truly improve societal norms?

 


[i] Rem Koolhaas, quoted in Stan Allen, Points and Lines: Diagrams and Projects for the City (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1999).

[ii] George Baird, “‘Criticality’ and Its Discontents” in Harvard Design Magazine 21, Fall 2004/Winter 2005, pp. 16–21. See also Wes Jones, “Big Forking Dilemma” in Harvard Design Magazine 32, Spring/Summer 2010, pp. 8–17.

[iii] Giovanna Borasi & Mirko Zardini, eds. Actions: What You Can Do with the City (Montreal: Canadian Centre for Architecture, and Amsterdam: Sun Publishers, 2008).

[iv] Michael Speaks, “Every Day Is Not Enough” in Douglas Kelbaugh, Everyday Urbanism: Margaret Crawford vs. Michael Speaks (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan A. Alfred Taubman College of Architecture + Urban Planning, 2005).


Outline:

1)     Introduction

a)     Opening statement

b)     Introduction to Actions

c)     Initial examples

d)     Critical thesis

2)     Theoretical Explication of the Text

a)     Decline in the “Urban Age”

b)     “Post-Development” resistance through Action

c)     Borasi’s argument for the “everyday”

d)     Critique of the thesis

3)     The “Actions”

a)     Walking

b)     Gardening

c)     Playing

d)     Recycling

Final Critique and Ending    

Actions parkour.jpg

Parkour Montréal

Actions walkmobile.jpg

The Walkmobile

BRACKET [takes action]

Housing Resistant Forms of Life

Housing Resistant Forms of Life

By Hamed Khosravi
Shared Grammars, Individual Desires: Participatory Planning and Slum Upgrading in Brazil

Shared Grammars, Individual Desires: Participatory Planning and Slum Upgrading in Brazil

By Gabriel Duarte
Open House

Open House

By Matthew Mazzotta
Mobile Loitering: public infrastructure for a highly gendered urban context

Mobile Loitering: public infrastructure for a highly gendered urban context

By Mariam Kamara, Elizabeth Golden
The Space of the Commons: Dheisheh Refugee Camp

The Space of the Commons: Dheisheh Refugee Camp

By Alison Hugill, Dan Dorocic
See that my grave is kept clean: ritual continuity & spatial resistance along Futenma's inverted periphery

See that my grave is kept clean: ritual continuity & spatial resistance along Futenma's inverted periphery

By Steven Chodoriwsky
A Subject of Action

A Subject of Action

By Albert Pope
Place de la Republique in Paris

Place de la Republique in Paris

By TVK - Trévelo & Viger-Kohler Architectes Urbanistes
THE IMAGE OF THE SQUARE: Redefining Citizenship by Design

THE IMAGE OF THE SQUARE: Redefining Citizenship by Design

By Samaa Elimam
Delirious actions: gender tactics in public space

Delirious actions: gender tactics in public space

By Serafina Amoroso

ELASTIC COMMEMORATION

ELASTIC COMMEMORATION

By Guy Königstein
BREAKING INTO THE CITY Urban explorers' architectural posture

BREAKING INTO THE CITY Urban explorers' architectural posture

By Michael Cook
Off the Wall

Off the Wall

By Katherine Jenkins, Parker Sutton
Cultivate Collective

Cultivate Collective

By De Peter Yi
FAS: Architectural Activism

FAS: Architectural Activism

By FAS- Foreign Architects Switzerland
What a body can do: the political as generator of a common spatiality

What a body can do: the political as generator of a common spatiality

By Lucia Jalon Oyarzun
Bronx is Up, WTC is down: paraphrasing Leonard Bernstein. A public service guerilla action for Architecture League’s Make a Difference in Two Days

Bronx is Up, WTC is down: paraphrasing Leonard Bernstein. A public service guerilla action for Architecture League’s Make a Difference in Two Days

By Austin+Mergold With James Bowman, Denise Ramzy, Sally Reynolds
Contested Energies

Contested Energies

By Stephen Mueller, Ersela Kripa
Spaces of Conflict

Spaces of Conflict

By Lori A. Brown
The Empty City

The Empty City

By Martin Sztyk
Next page » Loading