Home in Common: Collective Platforms Towards A Convivial City
By Roy Cloutier and Nicole Sylvia and Lorinc Vass
As the age-old notion of ‘sharing’ passes into contemporary capitalism to become the basis of ‘the sharing economy,’ its character changes fundamentally—taking on deeply aporetic implications. On one hand, the networks of this ‘platform capitalism’ allow a distributed, fluidly-liberated mode of exchange, fostering forms of flux and openness that exceed the comparatively-static models that preceded it. On the other hand, this fluidity is too often accompanied by a dissolution of stability and mutual obligation, leading to precarious forms of life. The sharing economy is always in motion, for better or for worse.
Of course, this aporia speaks not only to the sharing economy, but also to similar tensions within both neoliberal capitalism and architecture itself, which—over the past two-plus decades of theoretical preoccupation with systems, fields, flows, and infrastructures—has, as Douglas Spencer notes, come to embrace an ordering logic uncannily similar to that of neoliberalism. Recently termed managerialism or, following late Deleuze, modulation, this tendency sees designers working infra- to the everyday. Seeking to define networks that not only foster but reshape and actively harness an entrepreneurial self-organization and emergence, these projects operate in a way perversely similar to the platform-capitalists of Uber or Valve.
In any case, the distributed, immanent forms of power that underlie both models raise a host of questions—not least around issues of agency, ethics, and collective action. How might sharing be reclaimed from the sharing economy, recapturing its heritage in communality, solidarity, and collective action? Could counter-platforms form the basis for a re-emergence of a truly urban condition—at least, in the sense in which ‘the urban’ is fundamentally an agonistic sharing of not only space but also agency? In turn, what are the architectures—the collective forms—of such a model of communal self-organization, and how might they point toward new modes of living together in the city? These tendencies begin to suggest ways to collectively construct a truly con-vivial city—excavating from the etymological root of the word a generous, ebullient sense of living-with.
Begun as a speculative research project, Home in Common uses the pretext of a fully-distributed collective-housing system as a cipher with which to decode the internal contradictions of distributed-agency models in both architecture and sharing platforms. Building from precedents in architecture (Hannes Meyer’s Co-op Zimmer; micro-units, Baugruppen), the article develops a notion of home in common: networked models of domesticity in which home’s constituent components are unbundled within the city, allowing them to be held collectively. This concept is then traced through four anecdotes that embody tendencies latent in such models: ‘I Take a Bath, You Take a Bath, We Take a Bath’ (convivial domesticities); ‘Cross-Dressing on the Block’ (mutualistic exchange); ‘Brains and Gains’ (fortuitous recombinations); and ‘Bloc/Party’ (emergent forms of collectivity).
Taken together, these concepts point toward a future in which fluidity and impermanence foster not precarity but rather new forms of sociality—lubricating a process of collective becoming. Urban space is claimed as an act of mutualism, sharing, and exchange: the city becomes a platform for a convivial, collective individuation.
209 Comments – Login to comment
jackman10 · Oct 18, 23 8:23 am
Hello my friend! I want to say that this article is amazing, nice written and come with approximately all vital infos. I would like to look more posts like this . ?????????jackman10 · Nov 5, 23 5:08 am
Thanx for a very interesting web site. Where else could I get that type of information written in such a perfect approach? I have a mission that I am just now working on, and I have been at the look out for such info. ?????????????jackman10 · Nov 5, 23 8:49 am
There is noticeably big money to understand this. I assume you’ve made specific nice points in functions also. ????????????jackman10 · Nov 28, 23 7:01 am
Could I make a bit of advice? I’m sure youve got something great above. But let’s say you also provided a couple of links towards a website that backs up what you were you mentioned? Or even you could provide us with something to check out, something might associate just what youre mentioning, sth more tangible? [Reply] ??????????????jackman10 · Dec 2, 23 7:36 am
You produced some decent points there. I looked over the internet for that issue and discovered most people is going along with together with your website. ????????????????jackman10 · Dec 9, 23 6:43 am
excellent issues altogether, you just won a logo reader. What would you suggest about your submit that you made a few days in the past? Any sure? ?????????????techcitypoint · Jan 28, 24 8:26 pm
meelouneducation · Mar 15, 24 2:10 am
Professional online course outsourcing http://www.wangkedaixiu.com/wkdx/ organizations have rich experience in writing, and if you choose outsourcing, your pass rate will also be guaranteed to a certain extent.neiljiohu · Apr 16, 24 3:20 am
We adhere to the principle of providing high value for money: while offering professional exam proxy services, we also understand students' financial situations and provide the most reasonable prices. As there are many different types of exams, each with varying levels of difficulty, requirements, deadlines, and quantities of assignments, there is no fixed pricing standard for exam proxy services from https://www.lunwenhui.com/examdaikao.html. You can place an order at any time so that experts in specific fields can review the syllabus and requirements of your online course before providing you with a quote. You can also separately book assistance for online, in-class, and take-home exams and tests.